• AAP faces pressure over trans youth care, guiding docs to keep parents in the dark about child’s sexual health

    FIRST ON FOX: A parental rights advocacy organization is sounding the alarm over the American Academy of Pediatrics’ (AAP) support for transgender medical procedures for minors and encouragement of healthcare providers to withhold the sexual health and history of underage patients from parents.

    The American Parents’ Coalition compiled a “lookout” showcasing videos and public statements by AAP asserting that “science” supports “gender-affirming care,” which can range from puberty blockers to cross-sex hormones to surgeries for minors. The launch of the online parental notification system comes weeks before AAP is scheduled to hold its advocacy conference in Virginia from April 12 to April 14.

    American Parents Coalition Executive Director Alleigh Marré accused AAP of acting like “a political advocacy group, putting ideology ahead of evidence and children’s wellbeing.” The “lookout” states that during AAP’s 2025 Leadership Conference, 98% of its members voted to make protecting sex change treatments its top resolution. 

    “Even as health systems abroad rethink experimental gender interventions, the AAP has doubled down on aggressive and irreversible procedures rather than exercise basic caution,” Marre said. “By prioritizing resolutions that elevate transgender interventions and partnering with activist groups, the AAP is acting to protect a political project.”

    HHS UNLEASHES SWEEPING CRACKDOWN ON CHILD ‘SEX-REJECTING PROCEDURES,’ THREATENS HOSPITAL, MEDICAID FUNDING

    In addition to advocating for sex change treatments for minors, AAP advocates for other political agendas, including banning so-called “assault weapons” and red flag laws, which allow courts to temporarily remove firearms from individuals deemed a risk to themselves or others.

    A 2023 blog post on AAP’s website titled “Supporting Our Transgender and Gender-diverse Youth” stresses that doctors must provide “unconditional support” to underage patients, including asking their pronouns, using their preferred name and prioritizing their desires to change their gender over the concerns of parents.

    “We have heard from parents, “I just don’t understand” in many of our conversations,” the blog post stated. “When patients and parents disagree about next steps for affirmation, acknowledge parents’ concerns, but always support your patient. When youth are not affirmed, there is a significant increase in depression, anxiety, risky behaviors, and suicide.”

    However, at least two research reviews conducted by the United Kingdom and the United States governments indicate that performing transgender medical procedures on minors may not carry significant benefits.

    CHLOE COLE ACT AIMED AT BLOCKING MINORS FROM UNDERGOING LIFE-ALTERING TRANSGENDER SURGERIES, GOP LAWMAKER SAYS

    A 2025 report from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) concluded there is a lack of proven benefit that medical and surgical sex-reassignment procedures alleviate a patient’s gender dysphoria. Additionally, a report by the National Health Service England found that a medical pathway may not be the best way to address gender-related stress and advised “extreme caution” for hormonal therapy for minors.

    In June 2025, AAP President Susan Kressly criticized the Supreme Court’s ruling upholding Tennessee’s ban on providing minors with puberty blockers and hormones, accusing the decision of robbing children of “basic human dignity.”

    THE MEDICAL SYSTEM PUSHED TRANSGENDER SURGERY ON KIDS — NOW IT’S FACING LEGAL JUSTICE

    “Gender-affirming care is medically necessary for treating gender dysphoria and is backed by decades of peer-reviewed research, clinical experience, and scientific consensus,” Kressly said in a statement at the time.

    Do No Harm Chief Medical Officer Kurt Miceli argued that AAP is misrepresenting “the low quality of evidence” supporting “gender-affirming care,” which “can cause lasting harm” to children.

    “They are among the staunchest supporters of sex-rejecting procedures for minors, vehemently criticizing HHS’s comprehensive evidence review yet refusing to submit a peer review when invited,” Miceli said. “It is now time for the AAP to re-evaluate their policy statement and follow the American Society of Plastic Surgeons in opposing these harmful, unscientific, and dangerous practices on American kids.”

    ESSAY EXPOSES CRUMBLING MEDICAL CONSENSUS ON YOUTH GENDER SURGERY

    AAP also created an Adolescent Health Care Toolkit geared toward teaching pediatricians how to engage in sensitive conversations surrounding an underage patient’s sexual activity, their gender identity, and even connecting the patient with emergency contraception based on understanding that this information will not be relayed back to the patient’s parents.

    In one of the videos, Kelsey, a 17-year-old “patient,” talked about having sex with her “girlfriend” named Mary, who had a penis. At the beginning of the video, the doctor ensured with Kelsey that their discussion “stayed between the two of us” unless there was a concern for her safety or another person. The doctor discussed plans for birth control and ways to prevent a sexually transmitted infection

    In another training video, a 15-year-old girl told her doctor that she was a “gender-queer-demi-boy.” The girl said she had not shared this information with her parents, and the doctor assured her he would keep it between the two of them.

    In 2025, AAP received roughly $19 million in grants from the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). The Trump administration terminated $12 million in grants, with HHS Secretary Robert Kennedy Jr. accusing AAP’s recommendations of being “just a pay-to-play scheme to promote commercial ambitions.” AAP sued, and a federal judge restored the grants as the litigation plays out in court.

    Fox News Digital reached out to AAP for comment.

  • Indicted Democrat Rep Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick one step closer to expulsion

    A bipartisan panel of House lawmakers voted to kickstart a process that could lead to the expulsion of a congressional Democrat accused of laundering millions of disaster relief funds into her campaign account.

    A House Ethics investigative subcommittee approved a motion for summary judgment, effectively finding Rep. Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick, D-Fla., guilty of nearly all alleged violations outlined by the committee earlier this year. 

    The verdict came after a rare public ethics hearing on Thursday — the first since 2010 — that lasted more than six hours as lawmakers from both parties grilled Cherfilus-McCormick’s counsel. The eight-member adjudicatory subcommittee, helmed by Rep. Michael Guest, R-Miss., announced its decision in a written statement Friday morning. 

    “After careful deliberation that lasted until well past midnight, the adjudicatory subcommittee found that Counts 1-15 and 17-26 of the SAV [statement of alleged violations] had been proven,” committee leaders said in a statement.

    EX-‘SQUAD’ DEM APPEARS TO BE LEANING ON RADICAL ACTIVIST AT CENTER OF DAMNING TLAIB REPORT IN COMEBACK BID

    The panel’s myriad charges against Cherfilus-McCormick, who is facing a separate federal criminal indictment, ranged from using ineligible funds to finance her campaign to repeatedly filing false financial disclosure forms and seeking “special favors” with recipients of earmark funding requests.

    The panel will meet after the Easter recess to determine its recommended punishment, which could be as severe as expulsion. Rep. Greg Steube, R-Fla., has vowed to move forward with his resolution that would expel Cherfilus-McCormick regardless of the outcome. 

    Under House rules, two-thirds of lawmakers have to agree to expel a member, meaning Steube’s resolution would need the support of some Democrats. 

    House Democratic leadership has largely stood by Cherfilus-McCormick so far, though some congressional Democrats are signaling their discomfort with the allegations against their indicted colleague.

    “The allegations before us are extremely serious,” Rep. Mark Desaulnier, D-Calif., said at the start of the hearing Thursday. “They not only concern an individual member’s conduct, they also implicate the public’s confidence in the House’s integrity as an institution.”

    Cherfilus-McCormick, who first won election to Congress in 2021, is accused of stealing more than $5 million in disaster relief funds that were improperly paid to her family’s healthcare company, among other criminal allegations. She and her siblings allegedly used the illicit funds to jumpstart her congressional campaign and for personal use, including the purchase of a large diamond ring that Cherfilus-McCormick appeared to have worn in her official congressional portrait. 

    Cherfilus-McCormick has pleaded not guilty to the stunning federal charges brought in 2025. If convicted in federal court, Cherfilus-McCormick, 47, faces up to 53 years in prison.

    WATCHDOG RELEASES SCATHING REPORT ON TLAIB’S ALLEGED TIES TO TERRORIST GROUPS WARNING OF ‘POTENTIAL RISKS’

    The House ethics panel’s investigation into Cherfilus-McCormick preceded the 2025 federal criminal indictment by more than two years. During that time, Cherfilus-McCormick shifted between four different attorneys while largely refusing to cooperate with the bipartisan panel.

    On Thursday, Cherfilus-McCormick sought to use the fact of her new legal representation to further delay the committee’s proceedings until June — a request the eight-member panel promptly denied in a closed-door session. Her new attorney, William Barzee, repeatedly claimed a violation of Cherfilus-McCormick’s due process rights while maintaining her innocence.

    “For you to sit here and make the claim that we, the committee, is trying to trample upon the rights of your client. I take offense to that,” Guest told Barzee in a combative exchange. “For two years we’ve tried to get documents from your client. Not only have we requested documents, but we have subpoenaed those documents. Those documents were not provided for two years.”

    “I’m personally offended because I know the work that this committee goes to protect all members and to make sure that we go above and beyond,” Guest continued.

    Members of both parties appeared unconvinced by Barzee’s argument, attempting to claim that Cherfilus-McCormick was entitled to the millions of dollars she accepted from her family’s company that stemmed from the FEMA overpayments.

    When he claimed that an undated chart was evidence of a “profit-sharing agreement” showing her legal title to the money, the bipartisan panel appeared visibly perturbed. 

    “I did a lot of business transaction law for a number of years before I came to Congress. I drafted a lot of profit-sharing agreements. Never saw one that was just a chart that was unsigned,” Rep. Nathaniel Moran, R-Texas, told Barzee.

    Later in the hearing, Barzee argued that because Cherfilus-McCormick is of Haitian descent, it was not atypical to have a “handshake agreement” to divvy up millions of dollars between her and her family instead of a formal legal document.

    Cherfilus-McCormick faces an upcoming federal criminal trial this summer. 

  • Reporter’s Notebook: The hitchhiker’s guide to what’s next to end the DHS shutdown

    When will the House vote on the Senate deal? Frankly, we do not know. Last night’s Senate measure was not pre-baked with the House. And we talked to dozens of House Republicans yesterday who did not want to just fund parts of DHS. They wanted to fund everything. 

    We also don’t know the disposition of the president on this. When asked about a GOP proposal earlier this week to just fund parts of DHS and leave out ICE, President Donald Trump replied, “I’m pretty much not happy with it.”

    DHS SHUTDOWN BREAKTHROUGH COMES AT COST FOR REPUBLICANS AS FUNDING FIGHTS NEARS END

    And, if it is to pass the House, it’s about the math. Lawmakers will need a robust combination of Democrats and Republicans to approve this bill. Democrats failed to secure the bona fide reforms they wanted for ICE. So do liberals defect? This bipartisan parliamentary algebra will be exceedingly interesting.

    In short, this was a jam job by the Senate. The Senate has left. Either the House takes the bill or leaves it.

    In Congress, there are only so many exit ramps off the highway. The Senate saw one. There was the growing crisis at the airports. TSA workers were about to miss paychecks again. And that’s to say nothing of lawmakers — potentially being mired in Washington and missing their two-week-plus recess for Easter and Passover.

    SCHUMER, DEMS BLOCK DHS FUNDING AGAIN AS TRUMP INTERVENES TO PAY TSA AGENTS

    The House could expedite the bill and pass it quickly via “suspension of the rules.” But that requires a two-thirds vote. A slightly longer process is the conventional track with bringing a rule to the floor to manage debate on the bill. But eventual passage of the bill only needs a simple majority.

    Also, no one really “won” this shutdown. There are rarely winners from a shutdown. Yes, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., may have scored some points from the liberal base by going to the mat over ICE following the Minnesota shootings. He needed to do that after caving and averting a government shutdown last March. That ignited a firestorm among liberals.

    Also, the charge last night for Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., was not to get support to pass the bill — but to secure guarantees from senators that they wouldn’t try to block it.

    That’s partly why the Senate voted by voice vote. There is no specific record of any senator “voting” for the bill. The Senate ran a “hotline” last night, checking in with all 100 senators to make sure there were no objections to what Thune proposed doing. No one objected. And thus, the Senate passed the bill in the dead of night.

  • DOJ probes California, Maine over transgender inmate housing policies

    The Department of Justice on Thursday launched civil rights investigations into prison systems in California and Maine over policies allowing transgender inmates to be housed in women’s facilities, citing concerns about female inmates’ safety.

    The probes will examine whether the states are engaged in a “pattern or practice” of violating inmates’ rights, part of a broader federal push targeting what officials call a growing national issue.

    Attorney General Pamela Bondi said keeping “men out of women’s prisons [was] not only common sense – it’s a matter of safety and constitutional rights.”

    The investigations focus on two California facilities and the Maine Correctional Center. Officials cited allegations of sexual assault, rape and a “pervasive climate of sexual intimidation.”

    TRUMP ADMIN FINDS CALIFORNIA BAN ON NOTIFYING PARENTS OF GENDER TRANSITIONS VIOLATED FEDERAL LAW

    The DOJ said the probes are being conducted under federal civil rights law and will examine potential violations of inmates’ constitutional protections.

    In California, the policy stems from a 2020 law allowing inmates to be housed based on gender identity. The issue gained attention after a transgender inmate housed in a women’s prison was later charged with multiple counts of rape.

    In Maine, officials are investigating allegations that a male inmate remained housed with women despite complaints of assault or harassment.

    FBI LAUNCHES PROBES INTO 3 CHILDREN’S HOSPITALS FOR ALLEGED GENITAL MUTILATION OF MINORS

    Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon said the DOJ will not allow women in custody to face “unconstitutional risks of harm.”

    “These investigations will uncover whether the dangerous national trend of housing men in women’s prisons has resulted in violations of women’s constitutional rights,” Dhillon said.

    California officials say they are committed to inmate safety, while a spokesperson for Maine’s governor has called the probe politically motivated.

    Fox News Digital has reached out to the DOJ and state officials for comment.

    The investigations are ongoing and could lead to legal action if violations are found.

  • Former Dolton, Illinois ‘super mayor’ pushes for federal troops in Chicago after father shot in neck

    Former Dolton Mayor and Thornton Township supervisor Tiffany Henyard urged Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker and Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson to accept federal assistance to help clean up crime, noting in a statement that her father had become a gun violence victim.

    Henyard opened her statement by calling herself “SuperMayor Tiffany A. Henyard.”

    “Yes, it is true, my family has been directly affected by the senseless gun violence that continues to plague Illinois. Yesterday, my father, my hero was an innocent victim of this random and heartbreaking violence,” she noted in a statement shared on social media on Thursday.

    FORMER SCANDAL-PLAGUED ILLINOIS ‘SUPER MAYOR’ EYES POLITICAL COMEBACK AS A REPUBLICAN IN GEORGIA

    “At this time, I am calling on Governor JB Pritzker and Mayor Brandon Johnson to seriously reconsider federal assistance from President Donald J. Trump to help address this crisis and better protect the residents of Illinois, particularly in Chicago,” she noted in the statement. “Across the country, communities that have welcomed federal support have experienced measurable reductions in crime. Cities such as Memphis, Tennessee; Washington, D.C. and New Orleans, Louisiana during the 2026 Mardi Gras period have all seen positive outcomes through collaboration efforts.”

    President Donald Trump notably deployed the National Guard to all three cities as part of federal intervention geared toward crime reduction and public safety.

    Henyard said the residents of Illinois “deserve to feel safe in their homes and neighborhoods,” adding that the “difference between Illinois and those other states is simple, their leadership chose collaboration, and that collaboration produces results.”

    “I respectfully urge Governor Pritzker to reconsider working in partnership with President Donald J. Trump to ensure the safety and well-being of the people you were elected to serve. Once again, thank you for your prayers, your support, and your compassion. Please continue to keep my family lifted in prayer during this extremely difficult time,” she wrote.

    SUPREME COURT RULES ON LEGALITY OF TRUMP NATIONAL GUARD DEPLOYMENT TO ILLINOIS

    WLS-TV reported that Henyard’s father was wounded in a shooting that happened around 5:54 p.m. Wednesday in the 1300 block South Kedzie Avenue in North Lawndale. According to the outlet, Chicago police said a 65-year-old man was in an alley when he was shot in the neck and was taken to the hospital in serious condition.

    OUSTED DEM ‘SUPER MAYOR’ CHARGES WHOPPING PRICE TAG FOR TELL-ALL BOOK WHILE DODGING LEGAL TROUBLES

    Henyard, who lost the 2025 Democratic Dolton mayoral primary, is now running for Fulton County board of commissioners District 5 in Georgia as a Republican.

  • Battleground Dem candidate linked public displays of faith to political violence in 2023 speech

    A Democratic House candidate running in a battleground seat in southwestern Iowa linked faith to political violence while warning against religion in public life, according to unearthed audio reviewed by Fox News Digital.

    “We have seen religion and political violence showing up more and more in our public spaces,” Democratic candidate Sarah Trone Garriott said in a 2023 speech at a Methodist church. “It’s something that is just very in our faces and something that we’re very concerned about, and something that feels very threatening right now at this time.” 

    Trone Garriott, a state legislator and Lutheran minister, is running to defeat Rep. Zach Nunn, R-Iowa, in November’s midterm elections. Prior to launching a House bid, Trone Garriott fashioned herself as a fierce opponent of Christian nationalism — a term some conservatives have argued that critics use to paint some Christians as prone to violence and hostile toward democracy.

    In the speech, Trone Garriott said it was “a good thing to talk about religion and politics together” and spoke positively about living out one’s faith in their community. However, she repeatedly voiced discomfort about seeing public Christian displays and suggested it was something to be rooted out.

    AMERICA’S CHURCHES UNDER SIEGE AS VIOLENCE INCREASINGLY INVADES SACRED GROUND

    An image of a woman holding a sign with the phrase “one nation under God, indivisible” found in the Pledge of Allegiance, according to Trone Garriott, was one of several “pretty uncomfortable ways that faith and political power have collided.” The Iowa Democrat also called attention to Christian displays at one of President Donald Trump’s rallies and during the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol.

    “This is not a Christian nation. It’s a nation for all of us,” Trone Garriott told the church congregants. “Spaces and proceedings need to be for all people, and we need to work on reminding folks of that.”

    As a state senator, Trone Garriott said she intentionally sought out opening prayers that were not from the “White American Christian variety,” but from atheist, secular and other non-Christian perspectives.

    Trone Garriott also spoke critically of parental rights in education and private Christian schools. She charged that both stemmed from racist opposition to the integration of public schools when parents desired to create a “White enclave” for their children.

    “So maybe some of these things sound familiar today,” Trone Garriott said in her remarks. “It’s nothing new.”

    The Iowa Democrat then proceeded to tie White men to her criticism of legislation barring biological males from women’s sports or preventing children from reading sexually explicit material. She notably opposed a bill keeping men out of women’s sports while serving in the state Senate.

    “It’s really couched in the language of there’s a threat against women and White men are responsible to protect women from threats,” Trone Garriott said. 

    Trone Garriott’s campaign did not respond to multiple requests for comment.

    DEMOCRAT RISING STAR CALLED OUT FOR ‘CREEPY’ COMMENT ABOUT TRANSGENDER CHILDREN

    Nunn, who is seeking a third term in November, slammed Trone Garriott’s comments in the resurfaced video in a statement to Fox News Digital.

    “I was raised around Iowans who go to church every week and show up for their neighbors,” Nunn said. “Sarah Trone Garriott can’t walk into a church without delivering a lecture about how their faith is threatening and their schools are racist.”

    “She’s made it clear that the values Iowa families live by every single day are the ones she’s running against,” he added.

    The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC), House Democrats’ campaign arm, said Trone Garriott is working to unify Iowans in the 3rd Congressional District and condemns political violence.

    “Sarah is a mom and minister who has served her community as a hospital chaplain and a parish pastor — public display of her faith has been a guiding force in Sarah’s life and continues to be to this day,” DCCC spokesperson Katie Smith said. “Sarah has always condemned political violence however it rears its ugly head and will always work to bring Iowans together.”

    The nonpartisan Cook Political Report rates the contest for the Republican-held seat as a “toss-up.”

  • China’s American Mao: Inside Singham’s blueprint to ‘wage war’ for a ‘new world order’

    Part 5 of a Fox News Digital series investigating the House of Singham investigates how an American tycoon built an “International Revolutionary Front,” in the words of Mao Zedong, a global system in which ideology, funding, activism and propaganda converge. This reporting includes analysis using large-language modeling.

    Last November in Shanghai, as American tech tycoon Neville Roy SIngham took the stage at the Golden Tulip hotel for a conference endorsed by the Chinese Communist Party, he offered the clearest window yet into the ideology and strategy behind the global network he has funded over nearly a decade. 

    Clutching a 172-page report he had authored, Singham put forward a worldview that reframes history, challenges Western power and calls for a “new world order” promoted by Chinese President Xi Jinping and the Communist Party of China, or CPC, as it’s called in the country.

    “If we want to, therefore, have a new world order that is based on multilateralism that President Xi and CPC and China have proposed, we have to undo the ideological damage that has been done by the narrative of World War II,” he said.

    The packed room of about 200 ideologues assembled for the Global South Academic Forum, applauded enthusiastically. And it was no wonder. 

    In the audience in Shanghai, Mao’s vision of an “international revolutionary front” appeared in real time, a cross-border network of academics, activists and organizers listening intently, many of whom Singham has helped fund over the past decade, a Fox News Digital investigation reveals.

    The House of Singham, as Fox News Digital has uncovered, includes a network of about 2,000 organizations spanning the globe, from the People’s Forum in New York City to the Shanghai Maku Cultural Communication Co. that Singham has built after his 2017 wedding in Jamaica to Jodie Evans, a globe-trotting activist and co-founder of CodePink, a nonprofit that Singham also funded.

    From their honeymoon in China and over the years, Evans has called Singham her “adorable troublemaker,” her “darling Roy” and “adorable husband” in Instagram posts, while regaling his love of ping pong.

    PART 1: POWER COUPLE OF CHAOS: HOW A TYCOON AND ACTIVIST BUILT A ‘REVOLUTIONARY BASE’ AT THE HOUSE OF SINGHAM

    In new details that have not been previously reported, Fox News Digital uncovered material in Singham’s own writings that underscores just how he has positioned himself as China’s new American Mao, adapting Maoist doctrine for a modern era of global activism, media and ideological warfare against the United States.

    In his study, “80th Anniversary of the Victory of the World Anti-Fascist War,” Singham invoked the “truth” of Mao from the communist leader’s book “On Protracted War,” where he wrote, “The richest source of power to wage war lies in the masses of the people.”

    Singham’s study revealed not just an interpretation of history, but a strategy.

    “The war never strategically ended,” Singham wrote. “It simply changed form.”

    At the core of his thinking is a rejection of the West and the United States of America and its system of free enterprise, or “fascism,” as he calls it derisively.

    “The liberal fiction of three competing systems — democracy, fascism and communism — obscures the truth,” Singham wrote. “Fascism is capitalism in crisis, its mask dropped. The real struggle was never between three systems but between two: socialism and capitalism, with fascism as capitalism’s emergency response to revolutionary threat.”

    The 71-year-old Singham funds his activism and lifestyle in Shanghai with a fortune estimated at nearly a billion dollars made on the 2017 sale of his American tech company, Thoughtworks.

    While his language often seems dense and academic, the idea is clear: the defining conflicts of the 20th century collapse into a single ideological struggle between socialism and capitalism – with “fascism” recast as a form of capitalism — one that continues today. 

    In that framework, terms like “fascism” have become central to modern activism, appearing frequently on protest signs and messaging produced by nonprofit groups in Singham’s network to describe U.S. policy, institutions, global influence and “hyperimperialism,” a term Singham uses in his report.

    In his paper and remarks, Singham advanced a sweeping reinterpretation of World War II, arguing that Western nations — particularly the United States — have falsely claimed credit for defeating fascism while imposing an illegitimate global system.

    He dismissed the conventional framing of World War II as a battle between democracy and fascism, calling it a “fascist lie,” and instead argued that socialist and “colonized” nations bore the true cost of defeating Nazi Germany.

    “This was not their war. It was their profit,” he wrote of Western powers.

    From that premise flows a broader conclusion: that the post-World War II global order, shaped by the United States and its allies, lacks legitimacy.

    PART 2: RED WEALTH, DARK MONEY: HOW AN AMERICAN TYCOON DEPLOYS MAO’S PLAYBOOK AGAINST THE WEST

    In his writing, Singham makes clear that this is not just a disagreement over history, but a battle over who gets to define it.

    Singham keeps coming back to the idea of propaganda, even as he accuses the West of using it. He argues that Western power was built by shaping how people understand history, calling it “manufacturing memory” and “propaganda as history.” He writes that the modern global system is built on what he calls a “fascist lie” about World War II.

    “The current global system… is the product of betrayal — planned from the beginning, executed with precision, covered with propaganda,” he wrote.

    At the same time, he lays out his own approach, describing an “ideological apparatus” powered by “money and methods.” He argues that controlling the story — through media, institutions and movements — is a key form of power.

    “The ideological apparatus requires both money and methods — institutions, media, education and organizing structures that can sustain and reproduce the narrative,” he wrote.

    The concept that conflict has shifted from battlefields to narratives and from armies to information mirrors the system Fox News Digital has documented across a five-part series about the House of Singham.

    PART 3: SHANGHAI SABOTAGE: INSIDE SINGHAM’S SECRET STRATEGY TO DEMONIZE AMERICA

    Since his 2017 celebrity-filled “Revolutionary Love” wedding in Jamaica to Jodie Evans, the co-founder of a fiery activist group, CodePink, Singham has built a transnational network of nonprofits, media platforms and activist groups designed to operate across borders while appearing independent.

    Singham and his wedding guests set about building an international revolutionary front to harness the power of “the masses of the people.” 

    In a video interview with ShanghaiEye, a state-funded media arm of the Communist Party of China, Vijay Prashad, Singham’s friend — and wedding guest from the 2017 ceremony — explained the strategy was to tap the power of “the Global South.” Singham is chairman of the international advisory board of Tricontinental Ltd., which Prashad established with Singham’s money in 2017. Tricontinental was a key sponsor of the Global South Academic Forum.

    As reported, a Fox News Digital investigation found that Singham poured $278 million into six nonprofits between 2017 and 2023, building a transnational network that now includes about 2,000 organizations in the House of Singham. 

    To understand the global reach of the House of Singham, Fox News Digital further analyzed the international operations of key nonprofits in its network, including the geographical distribution of 223 transactions that moved $591 million in total, including the Singham seed money, across five continents from 2017 through 2025.

    The investigation also analyzed the geographical focus of 1,663 events the People’s Forum hosted between its first event in early August 2018 and its most recent gatherings early this year.

    Singham and Evans used the nonprofit groups they had created, with Evans sitting on many of their boards with scant disclosure in IRS tax filings about where they spend their money.

    The House of Singham “has a major transparency problem,” says Robert Stilson, a senior research analyst at Capital Research Center, an investigative think tank based in Washington, D.C., following the money on nonprofits.

    PART 4: REVOLUTIONARY TOURISM: INSIDE THE $600M MARRIAGE OF DARK MONEY AND FAR-LEFT AGITPROP

    The People’s Support Foundation funneled $108 million across the world. It gave money to 43 mostly Marxist groups around the globe, from Brazil to Ecuador, Haiti, South Africa, Zambia and Scotland, to run film training, schools, organizing and even the Marx Memorial Library in Birmingham, Scotland.

    Established in 2019 with a mailing address at a UPS Store in Madison, Wisc., the People’s Welfare Association named Eugene Puryear, a leader in the Party for Socialism and Liberation, to its board in 2024, according to its tax filing. It claimed to focus “principally” on “foreign communities with large marginalized populations.”

    The People’s Support Foundation gave the People’s Welfare Association $66 million between 2017 and 2024. In turn, the People’s Welfare Association pumped about $96 million from the United States to the world. The bulk of the money went to South America, where it sent $43 million, and Sub-Saharan Africa, where it funneled $41 million. It sent $2.4 million to Central America and the Caribbean, $9.5 million to Europe, including Greenland and Iceland and $307,150 to South Asia.

    What did the People’s Welfare Association spend the money on? It only says on its tax forms that the regional donations are for “grant-making” and “grants.”

    Decades ago, Chinese communist leader Mao Zedong wrote, “Without the united front, the revolutionary cause cannot succeed.”

    Tricontinental, funded by Singham and led by Prashad, has become an ideological anchor for the network, producing academic work aligned with the worldview articulated in Shanghai.

    In February 2017, Prashad was a featured guest at the wedding of “Jodie and Roy,” joining a panel on “The Future of the Left.” 

    By year’s end, he was named a board member of Tricontinental Ltd., newly established in Northampton, Mass., on Sept. 12, 2017, with Singham funding. Tricontinental got $17 million over the next several years to proselytize the merits of Marxism and China’s economic and political regime. 

    Tricontinental became an ideological anchor for the House of Singham. 

    By September 2022, Prashad wrote the introduction to a new report from Tricontinental, framing the U.S. as a war-monger, waging a “new Cold War” in the world. He used China’s Belt and Road Initiative, “building human dignity,” as a contrast to the “dangerous escalation” of the U.S. and the West against Russia and China. 

    There has also been rhetorical alignment between members of this network and far-left U.S. politicians, including Sen. Bernie Sanders, _Vt.; Rep. Rashida Tlaib, D-Mich.; Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn. and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., in statements critical of U.S. foreign policy. While the politicians have appeared at events supported by the House of Singham, no direct ties have been established between them and the Singham network.

    Earlier this month, Vijay Prashad went to Havana as part of a “delegation of solidarity” to Cuba. 

    One of the red flags is that Singham and Prashad coordinate conferences, like the Global South Academic Forum in Shanghai last fall, with East China Normal University, which the Chinese Communist Party’s Ministry of Education calls one of its “subordinate” institutions.

    In 1940, Mao called upon his followers to join “the international revolutionary front against imperialism.”

    By early 2018, a new organization stood up: the Justice and Education Fund Inc., with People’s Forum executives Manola de Los Santos and David Sung Mo Chung on the board, along with Tings Chak, also on the board of Tricontinental.

    Over several years following his 2017 wedding, Singham pumped $69 million into the Justice and Education Fund. Inc., with Box No. 203 at a UPS Store on Frederick Douglass Boulevard in New York City as its address. The funds were for a lofty mission of “community & human services.”

    The Justice and Education Fund also got a “non-cash” lease at the People’s Forum for office space.

    The principal is listed as Sung Mo Chung, the full Korean name for David Chung, the organizing director at the People’s Forum.

    In 2024, in an example of the circular flow of money between these nonprofits, the Justice and Education Fund got a donation of $5.4 million from another nonprofit in the House of Singham: the People’s Support Foundation, with the address at a hotel in downtown Chicago.

    Over the past several years, IRS records reveal that the Justice and Education Fund churned out $51 million – an important chunk of it outside the U.S.

    It also served as a clearinghouse for money sent back into the core hub of organizations in the House of Singham, sending millions of dollars back into BreakThrough BT Media, CodePink, People’s Forum and People’s Welfare Association, one of the latest nonprofits with a UPS Store address.

    It gave $3 million to another “People’s” arrival in the House of Singham: this one, the People’s Dispatch Ltd., a propaganda machine for Marxism in the world with yet another UPS Store as its mailing address. It had a familiar name as its president: Prashad, the wedding guest who spoke on the panel about “The Future of the Left.”

    Another favorite in the House of Singham: the Inter-Religious Foundation for Community Organization Inc., also got a boost with an infusion of cash. One of its executives, De la Cruz, ran for president as a candidate from the Party for Socialism and Liberation, and she has joined delegations to Venezuela to support communist leaders, like Nicholas Maduro.

    At the People’s Forum, Tricontinental and other groups’ programming includes Cuba solidarity campaigns, Venezuela advocacy, anti-Iran sanctions initiatives, opposition to NATO expansion and educational events on China, all framed within a broader narrative of “resistance” to U.S. influence. 

    Event flyers and social media posts repeatedly highlight Cuba, promoting teach-ins, cultural programming and delegations opposing U.S. policy.

    That narrative aligns with Singham’s rejection of the Western system.

    “The ‘rules-based international order’ means the same thing as the ‘civilising mission’: submit or be destroyed,” he wrote in his 172-page report.

    Not long ago, the People’s Forum organized 142 groups focused on spreading North Korea’s communism to South Korea.

    The Alliance for Global Justice funded Samidoun, which the Treasury Department described last year as a “sham charity” that supports Hamas.

    Critics say that these organizations should be forced to register as lobbyists for a foreign government under the Foreign Agents Registration Act, which is monitored by the Justice Department.

    What’s more, lawmakers have raised questions about whether these financial flows comply with U.S. nonprofit laws governing charitable expenditures and foreign influence. None of the entities associated with the House of Singham have been found to have violated charitable expenditure or foreign influence laws.

    Amid criticism from lawmakers and the Trump administration, the People’s Forum issued a rare statement last month, writing defiantly, “By labeling our organizations as ‘agents’ of ‘foreign manipulation,’ the U.S. government seeks to demonize and suppress the legitimate grievances of people who are disgusted by the violent ICE raids and deportation of immigrant communities, the deployment of military forces and federal agents to cities and towns in the United States, the persecution of students protesting the genocide in Gaza and the endless military interventions and use of blockades and sanctions to create famines abroad.”

    The People’s Forum added a link for donations.

    Nearly a decade after a wedding in Jamaica brought together activists, intellectuals and organizers, the network that formed there now operates across continents — funding organizations, shaping narratives and mobilizing protests.

    What began as a network has evolved into a system.

    And in Singham’s own words, that system is not simply reacting to the world as it exists.

    It is working to redefine a “new world order,” in the vision of the People’s Republic of China, President Xi and the Communist Party of China.

    Not long ago, the conference that Singham hosted released a video tribute to the ideologues and activists at the assembly, with a simple message: “Rise Up: A Song of Defiance….”

    Nikolas Lanum, Hannah Brennan, Brooke Curto and Kyle Schmidbauer contributed to this report.

  • Fetterman tells far-left prosecutor to ‘lighten up’ after threatening to arrest ICE agents over raids

    In the wake of a deadly shooting in Chicago, Sen. John Fetterman, D-Pa., criticized his own party’s reluctance to talk about violent acts carried out by illegal aliens with criminal histories and condemned calls from Pennsylvania figures to instead target Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents.

    Authorities are charging Jose Medina-Medina, a 25-year-old Venezuelan national, with the killing of a Loyola University student last week. Medina-Medina had already been arrested on unrelated charges months before but had been released.

    “How many Democrats are talking about that case? I think probably none,” Fetterman said.

    Fetterman said he was disappointed by calls from Philadelphia’s George Soros-backed prosecutor Larry Krasner on Wednesday, who, less than a week after Medina-Medina’s shooting, had threatened to arrest ICE agents.

    PRITZKER BREAKS SILENCE ON MIGRANT CHARGED IN STUDENT’S MURDER, BLAMES TRUMP FOR ‘POLITICIZING’ CASE

    “Lighten up, Francis,” Fetterman said, quoting overstated threats made by the comically aggressive character “Psycho” in the 1981 movie, Stripes.

    “[Krasner] is constantly — he says a lot of tough things but, you know, like, you gotta lighten up, Francis.’”

    Fetterman’s comments come amid a string of illegal aliens who carried out deadly attacks after being released from captivity for unrelated crimes.

    To the Pennsylvanian political maverick, the trend should be an easy one to condemn.

    “If you’re here in the country illegally already, and you’re breaking the law, like — ya gotta go,” Fetterman said.

    In recent weeks, the deaths of Sheridan Gorman in Chicago at the hands of Medina-Medina and Stephanie Minter in Virginia, stabbed to death by Sierra Leone native Abdul Jalloh, have intensified calls from Republicans for greater scrutiny of illegal aliens with violent track records.

    The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) blasted the leniency afforded to both suspects ahead of their deadly attacks.

    EX-ILLINOIS GOVERNOR ROD BLAGOJEVICH SAYS SHERIDAN GORMAN’S KILLING MAY HAVE BEEN A ‘GANG INITIATION’

    “She was failed by open border policies and sanctuary politicians who RELEASED this illegal alien TWICE before he went on to commit this heinous murder,” a DHS spokesperson said of Gorman’s killer.

    “We are calling on Governor J.B. Pritzker and Chicago’s sanctuary politicians to commit to not releasing this criminal illegal alien from jail back into American neighborhoods.”

    Similarly, DHS blasted Jalloh’s 30 releases before he stabbed Minter in the neck at a bus stop.

    “We are calling on Virginia Governor Abigail Spanberger and Virginia’s sanctuary politicians to commit to not releasing this murderer and violent career criminal from their jail without notifying ICE,” DHS wrote.

    Fetterman said the issue of repeat offenders has long-drawn his attention.

    “From what I read, the individual that was accused of killing [Gorman]. He was arrested for shoplifting. That’s why I was the Democratic lead on Laken Riley,” Fetterman said, referring to the Laken Riley Act that Congress passed at the beginning of 2025.

    CHICAGO MAYOR ASKED ABOUT CITY’S IMMIGRATION POLICIES AFTER ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT ALLEGEDLY KILLED COLLEGE STUDENT

    That bill requires detention for aliens convicted of bodily harm crimes like burglary, theft, larceny, shoplifting, among others, and empowers state attorneys general to sue the federal government for failure to do so.

    Fetterman believes the recent attacks underscore the need for vigilance in enforcing immigration law.

    “It should remind everybody how important ICE is for our security,” Fetterman said.

  • Marjorie Taylor Greene says Trump, GOP ‘governed America LAST,’ predicts midterm losses

    Former Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene predicted that the Republicans will lose control of the House of Representatives – and possibly the Senate – in the 2026 midterm elections, asserting that President Donald Trump and the GOP promised “America First” but delivered the opposite.

    Greene, once a staunch Trump ally who has since become a vocal critic, declared in a Thursday post on X that “Americans are suffering,” “Both parties are absolute failures,” and that “the system needs to burn down.”

    “Americans don’t give a d[—] about Trump building a WH ballroom or renovating the Kennedy Center as they are paying $4+ dollars per gallon for gas and nearly $6 for diesel because of another pointless foreign war. Americans are suffering. Suffering from all time high credit card debt. Suffering from ridiculously high cost of health insurance. Suffering from high cost of living. Suffering from ever increasing inflation and an ever decreasing dollar because of all the stupid decisions made by stupid politicians,” the former congresswoman wrote.

    SPECIAL ELECTION REPLACING MARJORIE TAYLOR GREENE GOES TO RUNOFF BETWEEN TRUMP-ENDORSED CANDIDATE AND DEMOCRAT

    “Republicans are going to lose the House in the midterms and maybe the Senate too because Trump and Republicans sold America First but instead governed America LAST,” she continued. “Democrats put illegals and trans above Americans and offer no new policies to solve the problems they too created. Both parties are absolute failures.”

    Fox News Digital has reached out to the White House for comment.

    FORMER REP MTG ASSERTS THAT AMERICANS DON’T WANT US WAR AGAINST IRAN

    Greene departed office in the middle of her two-year term early this year after she and Trump had a falling out last year.

    “Don’t lecture your voters that you have to vote for them when you have intentionally failed and betrayed your campaign promises just because the other side is intolerable. Screw you. You betray Americans, you put Americans last, you deserve to lose, you don’t deserve support,” she wrote in the post.

    EX-TRUMP ALLY MARJORIE TAYLOR GREENE RIPS THE PRESIDENT’S ENDORSEMENTS, SAYING THEY ‘SOLIDIFY THE SWAMP’

    “Many Americans are learning to live without the system and want nothing to do with any of it. Home schooling, farming and farmers markets, homesteading, networking among themselves is how many of us will survive beyond the insanity of the two parties. We’ve turned a corner and the system needs to burn down,” she concluded.

  • Knives out for Fetterman as Democrats turn on one-time progressive star

    Pennsylvania Sen. John Fetterman is facing escalating backlash from within his own party, with one House Democrat saying this week she has more success working with a Republican senator and another calling for him to step down.

    The criticism reflects growing friction between Fetterman and his progressive political base as he breaks with Democrats on key issues, including his support for Israel, backing of Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin, and openness to voter ID. Once a darling of the political left who exchanged endorsements with socialist Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, Fetterman now finds himself a target of attacks from his own party.

    “I have more success in working with the one on the R side of the aisle than I do with the D side of the aisle,” Rep. Chrissy Houlahan, D-Pa., said at a recent event, contrasting Fetterman with Sen. David McCormick, R-Pa.

    DAVID MARCUS: CAN JOHN FETTERMAN SAVE THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY FROM ITSELF?

    The remark drew jeers from the audience at the event, where Houlahan spoke in opposition to the SAVE America Act, GOP-led legislation that includes voter ID requirements and other changes to election rules.

    Houlahan urged voters to call “the office of your choice in the Senate” to voice opposition to the bill, adding that requiring “some form of ID is not an unreasonable ask,” but that “this bill is not that.”

    Fetterman did not respond to a request for comment but said in a March 17 statement that he would vote against beginning debate on the bill while underlining his support for Voter ID.

    “Stop turning this into a Christmas list and attacking vote-by-mail,” he said.

    Houlahan declined further comment.

    Last week, Rep. Brendan Boyle of Northeast Philadelphia took intraparty tensions with Fetterman to the next level by demanding his ouster.

    Boyle, who did not respond to a request for comment, lambasted Fetterman for helping Mullin get confirmed.

    “Once again Senator Fetterman shows why he is Trump’s favorite Democrat,” Boyle said in a statement. “He needs to go.”

    ‘THE VIEW’ CO-HOST JOY BEHAR UNLOADS ON FETTERMAN FOR BACKING TRUMP’S DHS PICK

    Rep. Pat Ryan, D-N.Y., a combat veteran and political moderate who has vocally opposed Mullin’s candidacy, echoed Boyle and blasted Fetterman for effectively getting the secretary confirmed.

    “If you needed any more proof that Fetterman has completely abandoned his constituents, here it is. Pennsylvanians deserve a Senator that actually fights for them,” Ryan said in a statement.

    Fetterman was not always a political maverick, having once been a progressive favorite praised for his blunt and unfiltered style. As lieutenant governor of Pennsylvania, he championed the legalization of marijuana and pushed aggressively for criminal justice reforms supported by Democrats. He aligned with the democratic-socialist Sanders wing of the party and hung pride and weed flags from his balcony at the State Capitol.

    In 2020, Harrisburg Republicans inserted language in a budget bill to ban flags other than the national, commonwealth and POW/MIA banners from being posted at the Capitol, to which Fetterman quipped, “it’s kind of flattering that they changed Pennsylvania law just for me.”

    Now, Fetterman recently claimed his party is “governed by TDS” — Trump Derangement Syndrome — and that he will always refuse to label Republican opponents “fascist” or make references to the Third Reich.

    Fetterman also told “Hang Out with Sean Hannity” that he has encountered his former 2022 Republican foe Dr. Mehmet Oz — the current federal Medicaid administrator — and that the two maintain a civil relationship with no ill will.

    He also issued a statement defending his support for Mullin.

    “In January, I called on the president to fire [Kristi] Noem — and he did. I truly approached the confirmation of my colleague and friend, Senator Mullin, with an open mind,” Fetterman said.

    “We need a leader at DHS. We must reopen DHS. My ‘aye’ is rooted in a strong committed, constructive working relationship with Senator Mullin for our nation’s security.”