Category: USA Politics

  • DOJ opens investigation into Eric Swalwell over sexual assault allegations

    The Department of Justice is investigating the multiple sexual assault allegations against former California Rep. Eric Swalwell, a source familiar with the matter confirmed to Fox News Digital.

    Within the last few weeks, Swalwell has been accused by five different women of sexual assault and harassment over the last several years. District attorneys for both Los Angeles and New York have also launched their own respective investigations.

    The string of allegations includes that he allegedly drugged and raped one woman and sexually assaulted one of his staffers, which have spurred at least two local criminal investigations. He has denied all the allegations, but has admitted to making mistakes.

    Following the allegations, Swalwell suspended his campaign for California governor and resigned from his position in Congress.

    ‘THE VIEW’ CO-HOST CLAIMS SHE PERSONALLY WITNESSED TROUBLING BEHAVIOR FROM SWALWELL

    “I am deeply sorry to my family, staff, and constituents for mistakes in judgment I’ve made in my past,” Swalwell said in a statement announcing his resignation. “I will fight the serious, false allegations made against me. However, I must take responsibility and ownership for the mistakes I did make.”

    “I am aware of efforts to bring an immediate expulsion vote against me and other members. Expelling anyone in Congress without due process, within days of an allegation being made, is wrong,” he continued. “But it’s also wrong for my constituents to have me distracted from my duties. Therefore, I plan to resign my seat in Congress.”

    While Swalwell was originally silent as the allegations began, his office broke its silence earlier this week speaking to the New York Post.

    ROSIE O’DONNELL HEARTBROKEN OVER SWALWELL SCANDAL, DECLARING ‘MEN SUCK’ AFTER BILL CLINTON COMPARISON

    “This false, outrageous rumor is being spread 27 days before an election begins by flailing opponents who have sadly teamed up with MAGA conspiracy theorists because they know Eric Swalwell is the frontrunner in this race,” Micah Beasley, a spokesperson for Swalwell, said at the time.

    Swalwell first became a member of the House of Representatives in 2013 after serving as a prosecutor in the Alameda County District Attorney’s Office. He was also a city councilmember in Dublin, California, in 2010.

  • Sex crimes could cost lawmakers taxpayer-funded pensions under Hawley’s new proposal

    FIRST ON FOX – A Senate Republican wants to prevent lawmakers convicted of sex crimes from receiving their taxpayer-funded retirements after leaving office.

    Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., is introducing new legislation, first obtained by Fox News Digital, to close a gap in federal law that strips pensions for some felonies, but not sexual abuse.

    It comes as Congress is having another reckoning over their members’ actions after sexual misconduct and rape allegations this month against two House lawmakers resulted in their back-to-back resignations.

    SENATOR GALLEGO SAYS LONGTIME FRIENDSHIP WITH SWALWELL ‘CLOUDED MY JUDGMENT’ AS RUMORS SWIRLED IN DC

    Lawmakers are required to forfeit their pensions if convicted of a spate of felonies, including fraud, treason, bribery and perjury. But there is no such law that would require a lawmaker convicted of felony sexual abuse to forfeit a pension.

    Hawley’s bill, the “No Pensions for Congressional Predators Act,” seeks to fix that inconsistency.

    “Right now, a member of Congress can be convicted of sexual abuse and still receive a taxpayer-funded pension. That is unacceptable,” Hawley told Fox News Digital in a statement. “I’m introducing legislation to end this loophole and ensure that lawmakers are never compensated with taxpayer dollars after such a breach of trust. The only thing the government should be paying for, for these people, is a jail cell.”

    His legislation comes on the heels of bombshell allegations against former Rep. Eric Swalwell, D-Calif., who resigned from Congress on Tuesday. Five women, including a former member of Swalwell’s staff, have accused the ex-lawmaker of sexual misconduct and rape.

    SWALWELL OUT AMID SEXUAL ASSAULT ALLEGATIONS AFTER 13 YEARS IN CONGRESS

    While no charges have been filed against him, the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department opened an investigation into Swalwell following allegations from Lonna Drewes that he had drugged and raped her.

    And, even if convicted, Swalwell would still be eligible for his pension, given that he met the minimum five-year requirement to earn a pension after having served in the House for over a decade. He could earn $22,000 per year in taxpayer funding starting at age 62.

    Former Rep. Tony Gonzales, R-Texas, who resigned from Congress just moments before Swalwell after admitting to an affair with a former staffer who later died by suicide, is also eligible for his congressional pension. He’s similarly been accused by another former aide of sexual misconduct that he has not acknowledged.

    Like Swalwell, Gonzales currently faces no charges.

    PELOSI, CALIFORNIA DEMS SLAM SWALWELL OVER BOMBSHELL SEXUAL ASSAULT ALLEGATIONS: ‘INDEFENSIBLE’

    Gonzales hit the minimum time-served threshold earlier this year and could earn over $8,000 annually when he turns 62.

    Hawley’s legislation also comes as misconduct allegations have made their way to the Senate. Rep. Anna Paulina Luna, R-Fla., said on X on Wednesday that “the Senate has its own trash to take out.”

    Luna told Senate Majority Leader John Thune, “You need to look into the allegations against one of your Senators, it’s very disturbing. My chief will be contacting your chief.”

    The South Dakota Republican confirmed that his office had received the information Thursday morning.

    “I don’t know what the particulars are about this,” Thune said. “All I know is that we referred it to the proper authorities, which, in this case, would be the Senate Ethics Committee.”

  • Harris stops in key presidential primary state after leaving door wide open to 2028 run

    Former Vice President Kamala Harris is sparking more speculation about whether she will launch another presidential run in 2028 by making stops this week in a crucial presidential primary state.

    Harris is in Columbia, South Carolina, on Thursday after making stops Wednesday in Greenville. For more than two decades, South Carolina has been one of the key early-voting states in the Democratic Party’s nominating calendar, and visits by potential presidential contenders generate buzz about their national ambitions.

    The South Carolina swing by the former vice president comes less than a week after she dropped a tantalizing comment at the first major cattle call of Democratic presidential contenders.

    HARRIS DROPS BIGGEST HINT YET ABOUT 2028

    “I might. I might. I’m thinking about it… I’ll keep you posted,” Harris said last Friday at the National Action Network’s 35th Anniversary Convention last Friday, when asked by the event founder, the Rev. Al Sharpton, if she would seek the presidency in 2028.

    Harris, who replaced then-President Joe Biden as the 2024 Democratic presidential nominee but later lost the election to President Donald Trump, was greeted by the crowd with chants of “run again.”

    The civil rights organization’s gathering gave Harris and eight other Democratic White House hopefuls an opportunity to speak directly to an influential group of Black leaders and activists who are key members of the Democratic Party’s base.

    Black voters are also key players in South Carolina’s Democratic Party electorate. And Harris, the first female and Black vice president in the nation’s history, received a warm welcome when she arrived Wednesday at a South Carolina Democratic Party fundraiser and reception in Greenville.

    HARRIS, NEWSOM, STIR 2028 SPECULATION AT MAJOR DEMOCRATIC PARTY MEETING

    Harris is holding a book tour event on Thursday for her memoir, “107 Days,” her look back at her abbreviated 2024 campaign.

    Harris was mostly out of the headlines for a couple of months after the end the Biden administration. She began stepping back into the political spotlight last spring and summer, including headlining Democratic National Committee fundraisers.

    Her decision last summer to pass on launching a 2026 gubernatorial campaign in her home state of California was seen as clearing the runway for a 2028 presidential bid. Her nationwide book tour has helped keep her visible while building email lists and boosting donor interest.

    The former vice president’s current southern swing also includes fundraising appearances for the state Democratic Parties in Georgia and North Carolina, two crucial general election battlegrounds.

    Harris narrowly lost both those states and the five other key battlegrounds to Trump in the 2024 election.

    Pointing to Harris’ schedule, a veteran strategist in the former vice president’s political orbit recently told Fox News Digital, “Of course we are reading tea leaves.”

    21 DEMOCRATS WHO MAY RUN FOR THE WHITE HOUSE IN 2028

    The strategist, who asked to remain anonymous to speak more freely, said, “No one knows what she is planning to do for 2028, but until she tells us herself, she is going to continue to travel, speak up about the issues she cares about the most.”

    If she does run again in 2028, Harris would be considered one of the early frontrunners in what’s expected to be a crowded and competitive race for the Democratic nomination.

    The Republican National Committee (RNC) is giving thumbs down to the White House hopefuls.

    “Democrats are kicking off the 2028 primary by parading Kamala Harris and a roster of failed governors trying to outrun their own records,” RNC national press secretary Kiersten Pels told Fox News last week as she pointed to potential contenders who appeared at Sharpton’s convention.

  • Reporter’s Notebook: GOP clashes over ‘skinny’ vs ‘obese’ DHS bill as Trump agenda looms

    If it’s up to top Senate GOP leaders, the next budget reconciliation package to finally fund the Department of Homeland Security will be on a fiscal cocktail of Wegovy and Ozempic.

    But other Republicans want this measure to be a high-calorie, political feast. Pop-Tarts, Sour Cream and Onion potato chips from Pringles, topped with Reese’s Pieces and a side of Häagen-Dazs chocolate peanut butter ice cream. All washed down with an entire two-liter of Mountain Dew.

    Stymied by Democrats — and in many cases themselves — congressional Republicans are now teeing up a reconciliation package to end the two-month-long DHS funding stalemate. By using budget reconciliation as a tool, Republicans can ignore Democrats, sidestep a Senate filibuster and prospectively pass the bill on their own.

    If they all stick together.

    GOP INFIGHTING REPLACES CLASH WITH DEMS, DERAILS PATH TO END HISTORIC DHS SHUTDOWN

    There’s a push by Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., to prep a bill as svelte as possible, since DHS has been penniless for so long.

    “We’re going to move quickly, decisively, and hopefully in a very focused way,” said Thune.

    This is why Republicans call this a “skinny” bill, devoted to ending the shutdown.

    “We want to fund ICE and Border Patrol and maybe a few other things. But very narrow. Very focused,” said Senate Budget Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham, R-S.C.

    But not everyone in the Senate Republican Conference is on parliamentary Weight Watchers.

    Some want to stuff the reconciliation bill with tens of billions of dollars to cover the cost of the war in Iran. Others want to include the touchstone of Trump’s legislative agenda, the SAVE America Act. It requires proof of citizenship in order to vote. There’s a push to tack on farm aid. Others are arguing for disaster relief.

    HOUSE CONSERVATIVES RAGE AGAINST SENATE DHS SHUTDOWN DEAL

    “It doesn’t need to be skinny. We need to do the SAVE America Act. We need to fund the war. We need to do whatever President Trump needs to do with DHS and TSA,” said Sen. Tommy Tuberville, R-Ala., on FOX Business. “Let’s put as much stuff in there as we can get now.”

    But loading up the bill could slow it down. Especially when time is of the essence.

    “The broader you make this, the longer it’s going to take to pass the bill,” yours truly pointed out to Sen. Bill Hagerty, R-Tenn.

    “That’s a fair assumption,” replied Hagerty. “But we have some critical needs as well. We’re going to have to debate all of this and decide exactly how far we’re going to go. Speed is critical.”

    I asked Thune if he was “worried” that some Republican senators may ask to dump “other things” into the legislation.

    “Well, they could,” replied Thune. “We have members who want other things. I mean, I want other things. But obviously we have a specific mission and purpose here.”

    Sen. John Kennedy, R-La., opined on what skinny or fat means for the fate of the legislation.

    “If John [Thune] holds firm, then the bill will remain skinny. If he doesn’t, it’ll jeopardize the bill being passed,” said Kennedy. “If he starts making deals, there will be four or five senators who take a run at it to try to have their stuff included. If he starts making deals to get their votes, it’ll be a huge mistake because you’re talking to one senator, and he is going to insist that [his] stuff be included, too.” 

    Kennedy called adding legislative sweeteners — increasing the political caloric count — into the legislation to convince reluctant senators to vote yes would be “a huge mistake.” Kennedy noted that “this skinny bill is going to become obese very quickly.”

    So adding Iran dollars into the bill is one option, but some Republicans are reluctant to spend any more money on Iran until they get some answers about what’s next. 

    “It’s going to be very difficult to get my support for any funding, or any additional resources from Congress until I have a clear, articulated strategy, how this is going to be ramping down over the next 60 or 30 to 35 days. Or, if it’s going to be escalated,” said Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C. “We need a clearly articulated plan if we’re going to be there for the long term.”

    ‘WE DIDN’T CAVE’: THUNE HIGHLIGHTS SCHUMER, DEMS’ LOSSES IN DHS FUNDING DEAL

    Other Republicans are willing to give the administration some leeway on Iran.

    “We can’t control the time it’s going to take to accomplish the mission. So the mission should be the goal. Not the time it takes to accomplish the goal. We’re in it. We need to be in it to win it,” said Sen. Cynthia Lummis, R-Wyo. “Look at Vietnam. The reason we lost is because that war was being managed by LBJ from the White House. And when the White House tries to manage the military and call the shots and make the day-to-day decisions, we fail.” 

    This is an apples-and-oranges question, but some Republicans are not-so-quietly getting skittish about how long the U.S. will be on the hook for the war. Especially as the conflict creeps toward the 60-day mark later this month.

    “I think it will be solved by then,” said a confident Sen. Bernie Moreno, R-Ohio.

    But even if the battle is over, it’s probable the U.S. would still maintain military assets in the region. There’s a running cost on that. That bill will come due at some point. And that’s why this reconciliation bill is such a ripe target for additional items like Iran war funding.”

    But Republicans are already promising an additional reconciliation bill. If the first bill remains lean, GOPers will inevitably push to stash whatever they can in the later package. Still, that’s hard. And with DHS unfunded for so long, that’s why Thune is trained just on approving DHS money.

    But reconciliation bills are complex. The House and Senate consumed the entire period from early February through July 3 last year just to pass the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. Thune and President Donald Trump want the DHS funding bill wrapped up in the next few weeks. So a third bill?

    “Those who tell us that we’re going to have a third reconciliation bill have been smoking the devil’s lettuce. We will never have a third reconciliation bill,” said Kennedy. “This is the last major piece of legislation that we will likely pass until the midterms. There’s a feeling, which I share, among the Senate caucus that this is the last train leaving the station. We had better get all our cargo aboard. Now.”

    Most diets fail. It’s not a question of willpower. But sometimes dieting is a challenge the deeper you get into it.

    The House and Senate are just beginning the current effort to pass the reconciliation bill for DHS funding. It may start out slender, but maintenance is hard.

    Here’s something else working against lawmakers: history.

    Congress is used to piling lots of things into “must-pass” bills. That’s where the extra parliamentary pounds come from.

    Diets often succeed because someone makes lifestyle changes. Will Congress make a “lifestyle change” and pass a reconciliation that only ends the DHS shutdown?

    It’s a weighty question.

  • Illegal aliens are getting taxpayer-funded boob jobs and sex change ops in Newsom’s California, watchdog says

    Illegal immigrants staying in homeless shelters in California have undergone sex change procedures and cross-sex hormone therapy treatments on the taxpayers’ dime, a watchdog alleges.

    Manhattan Institute fellow Chris Rufo reports in a video that some illegal immigrants have accessed transgender medical procedures through California’s Medi-Cal program, which provides healthcare coverage to low-income residents regardless of immigration status. The state spends roughly $9 billion in taxpayer dollars to provide healthcare for illegal immigrants, which also includes transgender care according to The California Department of Health Care Services.

    Roughly 1.7 million illegal immigrants received full-scope coverage in California’s Medicaid program, which in some instances included “gender affirming care.” California Gov. Gavin Newsom expanded the state’s Medicaid program known as Medi-Cal to all immigrants — regardless of legal status — in January 2024.

    Rufo filmed his encounters with illegal immigrants who are also transgender outside of taxpayer-funded homeless shelters in San Francisco. The video shows one illegal immigrant, a transgender woman from Honduras, talking about how they received cross-sex gender therapy treatment through the state’s Medicaid program.

    REPUBLICANS RIP 4 BLUE STATES FOR KEEPING TAXES ON TIPS, OVERTIME AFTER TRUMP REPRIEVE

    Another migrant interviewed, who claimed to have legal status, said they were able to get taxpayer-funded breast implants.

    White House Communications director Steven Cheung slammed Newsom.

    “This is like the holy trinity of woke, liberal, out-of-touch, perverse ideology from Scumbag Gavin Newsom,” Cheung wrote on X.

    California DHCS said in a statement to Fox News Digital that Rufo’s video and accompanying article contains “significant factual errors and mischaracterizes both Medi-Cal eligibility and covered benefits.”

    “It suggests that the State broadly provides gender-affirming surgeries to specific populations without limitation, which is completely false. Medi-Cal is a needs-based program with strict eligibility requirements,” DHCS said in a statement.

    DHCS added that Medi-Cal coverage for transgender care is granted if it’s deemed “medically necessary.”

    WHO IS TOM STEYER? ANTI-ICE BILIONAIRE IN CA GOVERNOR’S RACE FACES SCRUTINY OVER DETENTION INVESTMENTS

    “Medi-Cal covers gender-affirming care for members with full-scope Medi-Cal only when it is medically necessary, based on established clinical standards and consistent with nationally recognized clinical practice guidelines,” the agency said.

    But, a Medi-Cal manual reported by Rufo outlined that medical intervention is necessary if the treatment will alleviate symptoms of gender dysphoria. For instance, reconstructive surgery would be approved for coverage if it’s “determined to be medically necessary for the treatment of gender dysphoria.”

    State Democratic lawmakers have introduced legislation, known as Senate Bill 1422, which would ensure all illegal immigrants in the state receive coverage under the state’s Medicaid program known as Medi-Cal.

    The legislation comes in response to California pausing new enrollment in Medi-Cal in January for all adults over the age of 19 without legal immigration status in the United States. The pause in coverage comes amid rising costs as the state faces a $21 million budget deficit for the 2027 fiscal year.

    Fox News Digital reached out to Newsom’s office for comment.

    Fox News’ William La Jeuenesse contributed to this report.

  • Missing general, scientist deaths tied to secret US work prompt White House probe

    Susan Wilkerson was gone for just more than one hour when her husband, retired Air Force Maj. Gen. William “Neil” McCasland — who once oversaw some of the military’s most advanced and highly classified research programs — reportedly vanished from their Albuquerque home.

    McCasland, 68, left his phone behind, but his wallet and a .38-caliber revolver were missing, according to the Bernalillo County, New Mexico, Sheriff’s Office.

    The general previously had said he was experiencing what he described as a “mental fog,” according to investigators, but authorities stressed there was no indication he was disoriented at the time of his disappearance.

    “Arguably, he would still be the most intelligent person in the room,” Albuquerque police Lt. Kyle Wood said March 16.

    McCasland’s disappearance is one of 10 recent cases involving scientists tied to U.S. military and government research that have drawn attention, including at the White House, where officials said they are looking into the matter after being asked about a potential pattern. 

    “I hope it’s random, but we’re going to know in the next week and a half,” Trump told reporters Thursday. “I just left a meeting on that subject.”

    Here’s what we know about the scientists who have disappeared or died under a range of circumstances over the past three years. 

    McCasland disappeared Feb. 27 and police have found no trace of him since. His phone, prescription glasses and wearable devices were found at home, but his hiking boots, wallet and a .38‑caliber revolver were reported missing, according to the Bernalillo County, New Mexico, Sheriff’s Office.

    McCasland held senior roles in space research and acquisition, including leadership positions at the Air Force Research Laboratory and the National Reconnaissance Office, according to the Air Force. He held senior roles at the Pentagon and commanded the Phillips Research Site of the Air Force Research Laboratory at Kirtland Air Force Base in New Mexico, and the Air Force Research Laboratory at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base in Ohio, according to the Air Force.

    McCasland’s name also surfaced in an unexpected place years earlier — the 2016 WikiLeaks release of emails from Hillary Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta. In those messages, musician and UFO enthusiast Tom DeLonge described working with McCasland on discussions related to unidentified aerial phenomena, noting that the general had previously led the Air Force Research Laboratory at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base — a facility long tied in UFO lore to the alleged 1947 Roswell crash.

    “Neil does not have any special knowledge about the ET bodies and debris from the Roswell crash stored at Wright-Patt,” his wife, Susan, wrote on Facebook shortly after his February disappearance. 

    The 1947 Roswell incident involved debris later identified by the U.S. government as part of a classified military balloon program, though it has long been the subject of UFO and extraterrestrial conspiracy theories.

    Susan Wilkerson also noted that her husband retired in 2013. 

    “It seems quite unlikely that he was taken to extract very dated secrets from him,” she said on Facebook. 

    Reza, 60, was hiking with a friend in the Angeles National Forest near Los Angeles on a well-traveled trail around 9 a.m. on the morning of her disappearance, according to the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department.

    The friend was about 30 feet ahead, and told police he turned around to check on her and she smiled and waved, indicating she was doing fine. The friend turned back to continue hiking, and when he looked back again moments later, she was gone, according to, according to case details released during the search.

    He immediately alerted authorities who sent out a search party. Since then, there have been no sightings or any trace of Reza or her belongings. 

    Reza, an aerospace engineer, was the co-creator of Mondaloy, a nickel-based alloy capable of withstanding the extreme heat of rocket engines. At the time of her disappearance, she was the Director of Materials Processing at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL).

    Reza’s work in advanced rocket materials was funded in part by the Air Force Research Laboratory — the same organization McCasland later led — placing the two in overlapping corners of the U.S. defense research ecosystem, though no direct relationship between them has been publicly confirmed.

    Garcia, 48, was last seen leaving his home in Albuquerque around 9 a.m., captured on surveillance footage walking away on foot while carrying a handgun. He left behind his phone, wallet, keys and car, and has not been seen since, according to Albuquerque police.

    Garcia was a government contractor tied to the Kansas City National Security Campus, a key facility responsible for producing the vast majority of non-nuclear components used in the U.S. nuclear weapons arsenal. His role reportedly gave him high-level security clearance and oversight of sensitive assets.

    Authorities initially warned Garcia “may be a danger to himself,” raising concerns about his mental state. But an anonymous source familiar with the case pushed back on that assessment to the Daily Mail, describing him as “a very stable person” and disputing suggestions that he was suicidal or experiencing mental health issues. 

    Both Garcia and McCasland lived in the same region of New Mexico, a hub for U.S. nuclear and defense research, though authorities have not confirmed any connection between the cases. 

    Grillmair, 67, a California Institute of Technology astrophysicist known for his work on exoplanets and the discovery of water on distant worlds, was shot and killed outside his home in Llano, California, early in the morning. Deputies responding to a call found him on his front porch with a gunshot wound; he was pronounced dead at the scene.

    Authorities later arrested a 29-year-old suspect in connection with the killing, charging him with murder as well as carjacking and burglary in separate incidents. Investigators said the suspect had previously been reported for trespassing on Grillmair’s property in the weeks leading up to the shooting.

    Grillmair had spent decades working on major NASA-backed missions, including the Hubble and Spitzer space telescopes, contributing to research on galactic structure, dark matter and the search for habitable planets.

    Loureiro, 47, a renowned MIT physicist and director of the university’s Plasma Science and Fusion Center, was shot at his home in Brookline, Massachusetts, and died from his injuries the following day.

    His killing came within months of both the disappearance of McCasland and the fatal shooting of Grillmair, adding to growing attention around a series of cases involving scientists tied to defense and aerospace research.

    Loureiro was a leading figure in fusion energy research, studying plasma physics and working on technologies aimed at harnessing near-limitless clean energy.

    Authorities later linked his killing to a suspect connected to a separate mass shooting at Brown University days earlier. Investigators said the suspect, who had previously attended university with Loureiro in Portugal, died by suicide after the attacks, effectively closing the case.

    Despite early speculation online, officials have not indicated Loureiro’s death was connected to his research or to any broader pattern.

    Maiwald, 61, a longtime engineer at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory, died in Los Angeles on Independence Day. 

    The only widely available public record of Maiwald’s death is a brief online obituary.  No cause of death has been publicly disclosed, and reporting indicates no autopsy was performed.

    Maiwald spent decades at JPL developing advanced instruments used to study Earth and distant planetary environments, including tools capable of detecting chemical signatures such as water and organic molecules.

    His work focused on building instruments capable of detecting chemical signatures including water, organic molecules and other indicators scientists use to assess whether environments beyond Earth could support life.

    Casias, 53, was last seen on June 26, 2025, in Taos County, New Mexico, walking alone along State Road 518 near the community of Talpa. 

    Earlier that day, Casias, an administrative employee with security clearance at Los Alamos National Laboratory, had left work and spent time in Taos. At one point, her niece told local media, she picked up a Subway sandwich and dropped it off for her daughter, who was working at a coffee shop in the Taos Plaza area. 

    When family members returned home, they found her car, purse, keys and both her personal and work-issued phones inside. The phones had been factory reset, wiping recent data and communications.

    Family members have strongly pushed back on the idea that she left voluntarily. “All of her friends keep telling us this is not like her… she wouldn’t leave her daughter,” her sister, Trudy Najera, said. The family added that Casias had been preparing to care for their mother during an upcoming surgery.

    Despite multiple searches, no confirmed trace of Casias has been found since that afternoon.

    Chavez, 78, a retired Los Alamos National Laboratory employee, is believed to have last been seen around May 4, 2025, at his home in Los Alamos, New Mexico. He was reported missing four days later, May 8.

    When authorities and family members searched his home, they found his wallet, keys and other personal items left behind inside, while his car remained locked in the driveway. There were no signs of forced entry or a struggle, according to the Los Alamos Reporter.

    Investigators reviewed hours of surveillance footage from nearby homes and businesses but have not publicly identified any confirmed footage showing Chavez after he left his residence.

    Chavez had worked for decades at Los Alamos National Laboratory before retiring in 2017, placing him within the same northern New Mexico defense corridor as others who later vanished.

    Thomas, 45, an associate director of chemical biology at pharmaceutical company Novartis, was reported missing in December 2025 after leaving his home in Wakefield, Massachusetts, late at night. Surveillance footage captured him walking near train tracks shortly after midnight, and he left behind his phone and wallet.

    Thomas worked in chemical biology, a field at the intersection of chemistry and biology that uses small molecules to study and manipulate biological systems — work that plays a central role in modern drug discovery and the development of new treatments.

    At Novartis, he focused on identifying and testing compounds that could target disease-related proteins, part of a broader effort to develop new medicines for complex conditions.

    In the months after his disappearance, authorities conducted extensive searches but found no trace of him. On March 17, 2026, a body believed to be Thomas was recovered from Lake Quannapowitt after the ice thawed. Officials said no foul play was suspected, though the cause and manner of death have not been publicly disclosed.

    The overlap in timing and profession has fueled questions about whether something more is at play. But investigators have not identified any evidence of a broader pattern, and the cases themselves, ranging from confirmed homicides to disappearances and natural deaths, point in different directions.

  • House Republicans defy Trump to shield Haitians from deportation

    A group of House Republicans defied President Donald Trump on Thursday to support shielding more than 350,000 Haitian nationals from deportation. 

    Ten GOP lawmakers joined Democrats and one independent to approve legislation that would allow Haitians to be eligible for the temporary protected status (TPS) program for another three years.

    Those Republicans included Reps. Mike Lawler and Nicole Malliotakis of New York, Maria Elvira Salazar, Mario Diaz-Balart and Carlos Gimenez of Florida, Don Bacon of Nebraska, Rich McCormick of Georgia, Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania and Mike Carey and Mike Turner of Ohio. Many in that cohort have large Haitian diaspora communities in their districts.

    The TPS program allows foreign nationals, whose home countries face humanitarian crises or dangerous conditions, to temporarily live and work in the United States without fear of deportation. It does not provide a pathway to citizenship.

    SUPREME COURT TO HEAR TRUMP CHALLENGE TO PROTECTED STATUS FOR SYRIAN, HAITIAN NATIONALS IN US

    The successful vote comes as the Trump administration has sought to revoke the TPS program for Haiti, arguing that conditions have improved in the country and that granting Haitians legal protections runs counter to American interests. The effort is currently stalled as the TPS termination works its way through the nation’s courts. 

    The measure is largely symbolic due to resistance from Senate Republicans, who are not expected to hold a vote on renewing TPS for Haitians. Trump would almost certainly veto a TPS extension bill that clears Congress. 

    Rep. Ayanna Pressley, D-Mass., a member of “the Squad,” used a legislative maneuver known as discharge petition to force a chamber-vote on the TPS extension bill. The effort would have been futile without the support of a handful of Republicans who signed Pressley’s discharge petition to reach the necessary 218 signatures and trigger a vote.

    Rep. Laura Gillen, D-N.Y., sponsored the resolution on the House floor.

    JUDGE HALTS HOMELAND SECURITY PLAN TO END TEMPORARY PROTECTED STATUS FOR SOUTH SUDAN

    The president has also spotlighted the recent killing of a Florida woman by a Haitian illegal immigrant earlier in April. The man, Rolbert Joachim, 40, reportedly received TPS status during the Biden administration.

    “An Illegal Alien Criminal from Haiti, who was released into our Country by the WORST President in History, Crooked Joe Biden, and the Radical Democrats in Congress, just beat an innocent woman to death with a hammer at a gas station in Florida,” Trump wrote in a Truth Social post. “This one killing should be enough for these Radical Judges to STOP impeding my Administration’s Immigration Policies, and allow us to END THIS SCAM ONCE AND FOR ALL,” he added.

    Proponents of the measure argued that Haitians, who have been granted work authorization as a result of the TPS program, have a positive economic impact on communities.

    “I’ve heard from healthcare providers and business leaders across Nebraska who are concerned about the impact this would have on patient care and our economy,” Bacon, who is retiring, told Fox News Digital. “I don’t see the goodness of deporting people who are here legally, who are working, and who contribute to our country.”

    But the majority of House Republicans have stood by the Trump administration’s decision to revoke the TPS program for Haiti. 

    “Members of Congress have a sacred and exclusive duty to our American constituents, not to foreign nationals,” Rep. Andy Biggs, R-Ariz., who is running for governor, told Fox News Digital.

  • US eyes Iran fast boats with ‘kill’ tactics tested in Venezuela drug-boat strikes

    The U.S. is preparing to take on Iran’s fast-attack boats using a playbook it already has tested in another theater — lethal strikes on small vessels tied to drug trafficking networks in the Caribbean and eastern Pacific.

    Since September 2025, U.S. forces have conducted dozens of deadly strikes on suspected drug-trafficking vessels, part of a broader military campaign targeting cartel-linked networks. The U.S. campaign against drug-trafficking boats offers a glimpse of how American forces handle small, fast-moving targets at sea.

    Officials now suggest similar tactics could be used against Iranian vessels in the Strait of Hormuz.

    President Donald Trump made that link explicit in a Truth Social post Monday, warning that any Iranian boats approaching the blockade would be “immediately ELIMINATED, using the same system of kill that we use against the drug dealers on boats at Sea … It is quick and brutal.”

    EX-OBAMA ADVISOR SAYS IRAN COULD TARGET GULF OIL FACILITIES AS TRUMP BLOCKADE SQUEEZES REGIME

    Since the campaign began, U.S. Southern Command has carried out dozens of strikes on vessels, killing more than 160 people and destroying dozens of boats. Those operations rely on surveillance, rapid targeting and precision strikes, capabilities that could also be used in the Gulf.

    But in the Caribbean and eastern Pacific, U.S. forces are targeting nonstate actors with limited ability to respond. In the Strait of Hormuz, they would be confronting Iran’s military — armed, organized, and operating in one of the most strategically sensitive waterways in the world.

    Applying that approach in the Persian Gulf, against a state-backed military force, carries far higher risks.

    The Trump administration’s blockade of Iranian ports, which began Monday, has pushed U.S. forces into close proximity with the one part of Iran’s navy that has largely survived weeks of strikes: its fast-attack boat fleet.

    U.S. and Israeli operations have effectively gutted Iran’s conventional navy, with more than 155 vessels sunk during the conflict, according to U.S. assessments.

    Still, what’s left of Iran’s naval threat looks very different from what the U.S. has already destroyed.

    Large surface ships — frigates, corvettes and other major vessels — have taken the brunt of the strikes. But those ships were never the centerpiece of Iran’s strategy in the Gulf.

    The focus has long been on smaller, faster platforms.

    “We should think in the thousands,” said Farzin Nadimi, a senior fellow at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy. “If you include very small boats up to more capable fast-attack craft, the total could reach 3,000 to 4,000 vessels.”

    HEGSETH WARNS IRANIAN LEADERS TO ‘CHOOSE WISELY’ ON DEAL WITH US: ‘WE ARE LOCKED AND LOADED’

    Of those, he said, roughly 800 vessels to 900 vessels are capable of carrying anti-ship missiles, making them the most dangerous segment of the fleet.

    “They are dispersed along the coastline and islands, and protected in hardened tunnel complexes,” Nadimi said.

    Some boats are stored in underground facilities and launched directly into the water. Others are kept on trailers in dry tunnels — or moved inland entirely.

    “Some of these boats have been dispersed into civilian areas, in buildings that are large enough to hide them,” he said.

    Mobility, concealment and hardened infrastructure make the fleet far harder to eliminate than larger, fixed naval assets.

    The environment only makes the problem harder.

    Iran also has developed tactics to complicate targeting, including dispersal, deception and the potential use of drones and coordinated swarm attacks.

    The Strait of Hormuz narrows to roughly 20 miles at its tightest point, forcing ships into predictable lanes. Tankers, cargo vessels, and military ships all move through the same space, often with little time to determine whether an approaching boat is a threat.

    Iran’s fast boats are designed for exactly that kind of environment.

    They can blend into civilian traffic, disperse along the coastline, and regroup quickly — turning what looks like routine maritime activity into a potential confrontation.

    So far, Iran appears to be holding back.

    “They are now in a very defensive mode … trying to preserve what they have and keep them away from U.S. surveillance,” Nadimi said.

    That includes dispersing vessels, limiting movements, and avoiding detection by U.S. drones and other intelligence assets. But as peace negotiations drag on, that posture may not last.

    When Iranian fast boats move toward U.S. or commercial vessels, the encounter can unfold quickly.

    U.S. forces rely heavily on surveillance — tracking movements from the coastline and identifying potential threats before they reach open water.

    That’s where the comparison to drug-boat operations begins to make sense.

    U.S. forces are likely monitoring Iran’s coastline closely, allowing them to detect and potentially strike fast boats as they mobilize.

    In some cases, that could mean hitting boats before they ever reach the shipping lanes.

    “These boats are vulnerable to air power, but they are also armed and can use tactics to limit that vulnerability,” said Nadimi. 

    Unlike drug-trafficking vessels, Iranian fast boats are part of a state-backed military force and may carry rockets, anti-ship missiles, or defensive systems such as shoulder-fired anti-aircraft weapons.

    “We can assume many of these boats carry systems like MANPADS,” Nadimi said. MANPADS — short for man-portable air defense systems — are shoulder-fired missiles capable of targeting aircraft.

    The Strait of Hormuz remains one of the world’s most critical shipping routes, and even limited disruption can ripple through global energy markets.

    With Iran’s fast-boat fleet still largely intact and U.S. forces now enforcing a blockade, the next phase of the conflict may hinge on fast-moving encounters at sea.

    Iran has not publicly responded to Trump’s comments about targeting fast boats using tactics used in counter-narcotics operations, and a ceasefire remains in effect while the U.S. and Iran attempt to negotiate a longer-term peace deal. 

  • Judge orders Trump to halt White House ballroom construction, escalating legal feud

    A U.S. judge on Thursday rebuked the Trump administration’s attempt to proceed with construction of its $400 million White House ballroom project, clarifying in a sharply worded order that any above-ground, physical construction of the site is blocked unless deemed strictly necessary for national security purposes.

    U.S. District Judge Richard Leon said his order applies to all above-ground construction of the White House ballroom project, except for actions that are explicitly necessary to protect national security facilities or protecting White House personnel.

    Still, he made clear that the exception was not a blank check to proceed for the administration to continue the entire 90,000-square-foot project. “National security is not a blank check to proceed with otherwise unlawful activity,” Leon said Thursday. 

    He also sharply criticized the Justice Department’s “brazen” interpretation of the “safety and security” exception he granted in his original order, citing their claim that the entire project is a matter of national security,

    Leon described that read as “incredible, if not disingenuous.”

    APPEALS COURT LETS TRUMP RESUME WHITE HOUSE BALLROOM CONSTRUCTION, SEEKS LOWER COURT CLARITY

    Leon, a George W. Bush appointee, had issued a preliminary injunction in March blocking construction of the ballroom in March. 

    He concluded then that the Trump administration lacked the legal authority to proceed with building the sprawling White House ballroom without congressional approval, and that the administration had not shown it had clear authorization to replace parts of the East Wing with a privately funded structure.

    Lawyers for the Trump administration quickly kicked the order to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, arguing that completing the 90,000-square-foot project on the site of the demolished East Wing is critical to the safety and security of the “president, his family, and White House staff.”

    US APPEALS COURT HALTS TRUMP CONTEMPT PROBE ORDERED BY BOASBERG, FOR NOW

    Trump first announced plans for the 90,000-square-foot ballroom in July, initially estimating the cost at around $200 million. He has said the project would be funded “100% by me and some friends of mine.”

    Lawyers for the administration have also pushed back on the lawsuit, arguing the president has authority over White House construction decisions and that past White House expansions, including the East and West Wings, did not require congressional involvement in their design or construction. 

    The National Trust, meanwhile, has maintained that the project cannot move forward without complying with federal law and proper review processes.

    TRUMP ADMIN FIGHTS IN COURT TO KEEP WHITE HOUSE EAST WING DEMOLITION, $300M BALLROOM BUILD ON TRACK
     

    Last week, judges for the three-member D.C. Circuit ruled 2-1 to grant the Trump administration’s request for a temporary stay, clearing the way for the administration to continue construction on the project for now, or seek emergency relief via the Supreme Court.

    But the circuit court also kicked the case back down to Leon to provide additional clarity, due to what judges cited as the need for a more detailed explanation on what types of construction should be blocked. 

    Specifically, the judges asked Leon to clarify whether stopping the project would harm national security, as the Trump administration claims.

    Leon’s amended order Thursday reiterates that any below-ground construction at the site that is tied to national security— such as construction of bunkers, or other protected facilities, may proceed.

    The administration is permitted to take all measures necessary to physically secure the site, Leon said, including protecting the White House, and ensuring the safety of the president and his staff.

    But he sharply rejected the administration’s argument to the appeals court that the entire project falls within the scope of national security efforts outlined above. 

    Leon said the government’s arguments “are in direct conflict with [their] prior representations.”

    “In my view, these arguments fail to justify Defendants’ extraordinary, if not disingenuous, reading of my preliminary injunction,” he added.

  • Pope Leo slams those who ‘manipulate religion’ for military or political gain, Trump responds

    Pope Leo XIV, the leader of the Roman Catholic church, decried people who twist religion for military, economic or political benefit.

    “Jesus told us, blessed are the peacemakers. But woe to those who manipulate religion and the very name of God for their own military, economic or political gain, dragging that which is sacred into darkness and filth,” he declared.

    He also called out “The masters of war,” during the remarks in Cameroon on Thursday.

    “The masters of war pretend not to know that it takes only a moment to destroy, yet often, a lifetime is often not enough to rebuild. They turn a blind eye to the fact that billions of dollars are spent on killing, on devastation, yet the resources needed for healing, education, and restoration are nowhere to be found,” the pope said.

    POPE LEO SAYS HE’S UNAFRAID OF THE TRUMP ADMIN AFTER PRESIDENT CALLS HIM ‘TERRIBLE’ ON FOREIGN POLICY

    Fox News Digital reached out to the White House on Thursday regarding the pontiff’s comments in Cameroon.

    But the president himself spoke about the pope on Thursday after he was asked about the religious figure’s comments.

    TRUMP REJECTS AMERICAN BISHOP ROBERT BARRON’S CALL TO APOLOGIZE TO POPE FOR ‘DISRESPECTFUL’ COMMENTS

    President Donald Trump said on Thursday that it is “very important that the Pope understands” that “Iran killed 42,000 people that were totally unarmed, they were protesters.”

    “Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon,” the president asserted, saying that if the foreign nation did possess such a weapon, every nation in the world, including Italy, “would be in trouble.”

    “But the pope has to understand, Iran, very simple, Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon. The world would be in great danger,” he declared.

    Asked if he would meet with the pope to iron out their differences, Trump responded, “I don’t think it’s necessary.”

    TRUMP ACCUSES POPE LEO OF BEING ‘TERRIBLE’ ON FOREIGN POLICY OVER PONTIFF’S ANTI-WAR COMMENTS

    Trump blasted the Catholic figure in a Truth Social post on Sunday night, declaring that the man “is WEAK on Crime, and terrible for Foreign Policy” and that he should “stop catering to the Radical Left, and focus on being a Great Pope, not a Politician.”

    “I don’t want a Pope who thinks it’s OK for Iran to have a Nuclear Weapon. I don’t want a Pope who thinks it’s terrible that America attacked Venezuela, a Country that was sending massive amounts of Drugs into the United States and, even worse, emptying their prisons, including murderers, drug dealers, and killers, into our Country,” Trump declared in part of the lengthy post.

    “And I don’t want a Pope who criticizes the President of the United States because I’m doing exactly what I was elected, IN A LANDSLIDE, to do, setting Record Low Numbers in Crime, and creating the Greatest Stock Market in History,” he added.

    In a Truth Social post on Tuesday, the president wrote, “Will someone please tell Pope Leo that Iran has killed at least 42,000 innocent, completely unarmed, protesters in the last two months, and that for Iran to have a Nuclear Bomb is absolutely unacceptable. Thank you for your attention to this matter. AMERICA IS BACK!!!”